Reasons for a shorter work week
- A smaller carbon footprint: Countries with shorter
average hours tend to have a smaller ecological footprint. As a nation,
the UK is currently consuming well beyond its share of natural resource.
Moving out of the fast lane would take us away from the convenience-led
consumption that is damaging our environment, and leave time for living
more sustainably.
- A stronger economy: If handled properly, a move
towards a shorter working week would improve social and economic
equality, easing our dependence on debt-fuelled growth – key ingredients
of a robust economy. It would be competitive, too: the Netherlands and
Germany have shorter work weeks than Britain and the US, yet their
economies are as strong or stronger.
- Better employees: Those who work less tend to be
more productive hour for hour than those regularly pushing themselves
beyond the 40 hours per week point. They are less prone to sickness and
absenteeism and make up a more stable and committed workforce.
- Lower unemployment: Average working hours may have
spiraled, but they are not spread equally across our economy – just as
some find themselves working all hours of the day and night, others
struggle to find work at all. A shorter working week would help to
redistribute paid and unpaid time more evenly across the population.
- Improved well-being: Giving everybody more time to
spend as they choose would greatly reduce stress levels and improve
overall well-being, as well as mental and physical health. Working less
would help us all move away from the current path of living to work,
working to earn and earning to consume. It would help us all to reflect
on and appreciate the things that we truly value in life.
- More equality between men and women: Women
currently spend more time than men doing unpaid work. Moving towards a
shorter working week as the ‘norm’ would help change attitudes about
gender roles, promote more equal shares of paid and unpaid work,
and help revalue jobs traditionally associated with women’s work.
- Higher quality, affordable childcare: The high
demand for childcare stems partly from a culture of long working hours
which has spiraled out of control. A shorter working week would help
mothers and fathers better balance their time, reducing the costs of full-time childcare.
As well as bringing down the cost of childcare, working fewer hours
would give parents more time to spend with their children. This
opportunity for more activities, experiences and two-way teaching and
learning would have benefits for mothers and fathers, as well as their
children.
- More time for families, friends and neighbors. Spending
less time in paid work would enable us to spend more time with and care
for each other – our parents, children, friends and neighbors – and to
value and strengthen all the relationships that make our lives
worthwhile and help to build a stronger society.
- Making more of later life: A shorter and more
flexible working week could make the transition from employment to
retirement much smoother, spread over a longer period of time. People
could reduce their hours gradually over a decade or more. Shifting
suddenly from long hours to no hours of paid work can be traumatic,
often causing illness and early death.
- A stronger democracy: We’d all have more time to
participate in local activities, to find out what’s going on around us,
to engage in politics, locally and nationally, to ask questions and to
campaign for change.
1 comment:
The points are all well-taken and completely beside the point as we live in a so-called free market economic system by which standards and conditions are set by business or employer interests, and not by what is the best interest of workers or even society at large. The trend in Europe was to an ever shorter work week, and that was reversed as business interests became more paramount with establishment of EU.
Post a Comment